Skip to content

Updated getting_started.py example to remove multi-line command usage#1713

Merged
tleonhardt merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-getting-started
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

Updated getting_started.py example to remove multi-line command usage#1713
tleonhardt merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
refactor-getting-started

Conversation

@tleonhardt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updated getting_started.py example to remove multi-line command usage.

The rational here is that using multiline commands is not particularly common and only recommended for niche use cases.

The rational here is that using multiline commands is not particularly common and only recommended for niche use cases.
@tleonhardt tleonhardt requested a review from kmvanbrunt as a code owner July 14, 2026 23:35
@tleonhardt tleonhardt self-assigned this Jul 14, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.61%. Comparing base (e237946) to head (dd953ef).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1713   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.61%   99.61%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        5906     5906           
=======================================
  Hits         5883     5883           
  Misses         23       23           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tleonhardt tleonhardt merged commit ed92d58 into main Jul 15, 2026
29 checks passed
@tleonhardt tleonhardt deleted the refactor-getting-started branch July 15, 2026 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants